Second-Class Life

bar22

I found the following bit of research reported by Ars Technica to be very interesting. of course, the research is about There.com yet both Second Life and Wow are noted in the first paragraph. This could be because they are all somewhat similar Virtual Worlds, or because Second Life and WoW have powerful love/hate ramifications for Ars Technica.

Either way, the research, indicating that darker skinned avatars are mistrusted or disliked could indeed show that human nature is consistent in virtual life as it is in RL, both the best and the worst elements of that nature. I would be curious to know the racial backgrounds of the players involved as well, since their choices could be a case of “like and unlike”…also disappointing but slightly different then direct racism.

In a world where you can literally be anything, it is a shame some people still choose to be less then they could be.

The following was reposted from Ars Technica.

Researchers find racism translates to virtual worlds as well

By John Timmer

It’s easy to develop a confusing picture of what goes on inside of multiuser virtual worlds, such as Second Life and World of WarCraft. Some reports suggest that the virtual reality enables people to escape from social interactions they otherwise find difficult; others highlight how users of virtual worlds find them satisfying because of the rich social interactions they enable. Some researchers at Northwestern University looked into just how well real-life social influences translate to the the virtual realm and discovered one that does: racism.

The authors used two different instances of social manipulation that are known to work well in the real world. The first is the "foot in the door" (FITD) approach, in which a small, easily accomplished favor is asked. These tend to make the person who granted the favor happy about their cooperation, and more likely to agree to further requests, even if they require more effort.

The second method, called "door in the face" (DITF), accomplishes the same thing using a different approach. The initial request, instead of being easy to handle, involves an extensive effort on the part of the person asked. Usually, that request is declined, but it makes people more likely to agree to a further, less time-intensive request. Instead of being inwardly-focused, the DITF method depends largely on a person’s perception of the individual or organization making the request; the more responsible and credible they seem, the more likely the second request will be agreed to.

The researchers added a second layer on top of these two methods of manipulation by using avatars with skin tones set at the two extremes of light and dark that the environment, There.com, allows. This let them check for whether another pervasive social influence, racism, holds sway in the virtual world.

The tests involved the ability of There.com users to instantly teleport to any location in the game. The control condition, and the second request for both the FITD and DITF approaches, was a teleport to a specific location to take part in a screenshot. For FITD, the first, easy request was a screenshot in place. For DITF, the initial request involved a series of screenshots around the virtual world that might take as much as two hours.

416 There.com users were approached at random. Somewhat amusingly, about 20 of those approached for each test did something unexpected. For FITD, they simply teleported away before the question could be completed. Even more oddly, over 20 people agreed to spend a few hours taking screenshots with random strangers.

It turns out that social manipulation works just as well in virtual worlds as it does in the real one, with one very significant caveat. The FITD approach, which depends on people feeling good about themselves, increased cooperation on the second request from roughly 55 percent to 75 percent. DITF did even better, boosting the fraction of those who agreed to the second request to over 80 percent—but only if the avatar making the request was white. If that avatar was black, the response dropped to 60 percent, which was statistically indistinguishable from the control.

Since the DITF method depends on subjects’ perception of the one doing the asking, the obvious conclusion is that black avatars are viewed as less appealing than white ones. The virtual world not only recapitulates social manipulation, but also social problems. The judgment directed towards the avatar’s color is even more surprising, given that There.com allows its users to change their avatar’s appearance instantly.

The authors don’t seem to know whether to celebrate the finding, since it opens up new avenues for pursuing social research, or to condemn the fact that racism has been dragged from the real to virtual worlds. The recognize that there is an alternate interpretation—namely, that people judge users for having chosen to use a black avatar, rather than for being black—but don’t find that alternative any more appealing.

Advertisements

3 Comments

  1. Not really new, but definitely another chunk of something to chew over. I’ve heard of dark-skinned avs getting harassed, ignored, etc. OTOH, a Kiwi friend of mine with several dark, photorealistic skins says that she gets lots of positive attention when she wears said skins, even in Gorean sims (she’s an ad hoc cultural anthropologist, that one).

    As for yours truly, there may be some Sapphire/Jezebel stereotyping by others in the SL population, but usually, I’m just ignored. Whether it’s because of the dark skin or the eau de insanity that emanates from my tiny Linden pores, I may never know …

  2. Well, we all have certain things which tend to put us off of certain avatars. The anti-newbie prejudice is strong, and I know I have it to a degree.

    I can;t say I have ever had a negative reation to an avatar just due to skin color. I am far more likely to have an aversion to the endless virtual bodybuilders covered in bling with close cropped hair trying to act “gangsta” or “street” just because I know they are mostly white teenagers typing from their mom’s basement while she heats their spagettios.

    I have a problem with ethnic poseurs. Always have, always will.

  3. I will say this: when hunting for dreads once, a long time ago, I found two, precisely two, stores selling them. Those two stores are still around; and I do believe they’re still alone.

    By and large, unless one invests in custom work, the darker-skinned tones are simply that–deep, deep tans, with no facial reconstruction to mimic the ethnicity in the least. I can outfit head-to-toe as a Geisha (and have, in the past) easier than I can outfit as a credible African, East Indian, Moroccan…it may or may not show a bias, but it does make its own statement.

    Plus, there’s a certain case of a woman I first met in world who portrayed as black, and then bizarrely grew more pale the more time she spent on the grid. Reflecting the world? Trying in her own way to ‘fit in’, however she was interpreting that? Lost her original skins? I’ll never know, because I haven’t asked.

    Though I will say to Miss Kamenev–I think it’s less the skin tone and more the bizarre that drives people away, if they are driving away. Personally, I think such enterprises as the Wit’s End will keep them close enough to find out you’re at least as friendly as you are insane.


Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s