Victorian Boudoir Myths

1bar_023.jpg

Mankind has always had a fascination with the morals and sexual morays  of previous generations, all the more so when the ancestors in question are at once so well known yet as misunderstood as the Victorians.

Of course, in such a situation rumors, innuendo and outright lies run rampant. Therefore who better than the Baron of BardHaven to set Caledon’s easily shocked mind at ease concerning what our forebears actually did, or did not do, in the Victorian bedchamber.

The following highly informative essay is reposted from The Smart Set.

Quick, Jeeves, Cover the Piano Legs!

The Brits though Americans prudes. But then the table turned.

Nothing sums up the Victorians’ freakish attitudes on sex as the notion that they were aroused by cabinetry. The author Matthew Sweet has shown that this fanciful story actually began with an English tourist in the United States. In 1837, a pompous Captain Frederick Marryat visited a seminary for young ladies in Niagara Falls, where he was astonished to discover the piano legs sheathed in “modest little trousers.” These covers, a local guide confided, were necessary to preserve the “utmost purity of ideas” amongst the impressionable young girls. On another occasion, a Yankee girl told Marryat that even saying the word leg was considered too risqué in America; “limb” was preferred at a pinch. Captain Marryat dutifully recorded these factoids in A Diary in America.

There are no other records of this conservative New York habit; possibly the piano legs were really covered at the seminary to keep off dust. Americans at the time were heartily sick of the endless numbers of gullible English travel writers penning ignorant and patronizing books about their country, and Sweet speculates that the guides and young women at Niagara Falls were just pulling Marryat’s credulous “limb.”

But the British press seized on Marryat’s story with glee. Jokes about idiot Americans hiding their piano legs were repeated in Music Hall songs and newspaper stories for years; eventually, the story became shorthand in the press for America’s pathological prudery. But the story rebounded on the British. In a rare case of historical justice, when Victorians became symbols of uptight sexuality in the 20th century, the same piano story was used about them in plays, novels, and newspaper stories.

Today, despite the lack of evidence, it is still “common knowledge” that Victorians were feverishly hiding anything curved from impressionable eyes.

SOURCE/FURTHER READING: Matthew Sweet, Inventing the Victorians, (London, 2001); Wilson, A.N. The Victorians, (London, 2002).

VICTORIA’S SECRETS

The Victorians can’t win: Either we see them as sexually repressed kill-joys or pathetic hypocrites — lascivious aesthetes addicted to pornography, child prostitution, and opium. But are the strangest stories true?

“Lie back and think of England”

This pithy advice was supposedly given by Queen Victoria to her 17-year-old daughter, Princess Victoria Adelaide Mary Louise, on her wedding night in 1857, and has become a catch-phrase for frigid marital congress. But it is unlikely that the Queen ever said it; the phrase appears to have become common only after her death in 1901. The earliest found use is actually in the unpublished private diary of a certain Lady Hillingham, written in 1912: “I am happy now that (my husband) Charles calls on my bedchamber less frequently than of old. As it is, I now endure but two calls a week and when I hear his steps outside my door I lie down on my bed, close my eyes, open my legs, and think of England.” As it happens, Queen Victoria appears to have had a healthy interest in sex: Her diary as a young woman, before her figure ballooned and she swaddled herself in lace, is filled with frank references to her husband Albert’s masculine attractions.

Fear of pubic hair

One of the era’s greatest thinkers, John Ruskin, is said to have been so shocked by the discovery of his wife’s pubic hair on his wedding night in Venice that he ran from the room and refused to consummate the marriage. Apparently he had only ever seen ancient Greek statues of the naked female form and assumed that his wife’s nether regions would be as smooth and polished as Ionian marble. We do know that the marriage night did not go as planned: His wife, Effie, eventually accused him of “incurable impotence” and had the marriage annulled in 1854. In a letter, Ruskin later explained his reaction to his wife’s body: “Her person was not formed to excite passion. On the contrary, there were certain circumstances in her person which completely checked it.” In 1965, biographer Mary Lutyens speculated that this must have been his first glimpse of Effie’s delta, but there is no evidence for it. More recently, biographers have suggested that his new wife must have been menstruating on her wedding night, which shocked Ruskin to the core.

Was Prince Albert into genital piercing?

Victoria’s German-born, whisker-bedecked husband is rumored to have had a ring through his foreskin in order to secure his manhood via a chain to either side of his pant leg, in order to control its large size in tight-fitting britches. Actually, the adornment is a modern piercing option today, and happens to be called the Prince Albert. The name’s origin, which dates only back to the 1970s, may have been confused with the German-style watch chain the prince favored, which was commonly called a Prince Albert.

Advertisements

1 Comment

  1. I would love the article to have explored the role of the all concealing Nightgown & attendant Night Bonnet in the exploration of Victorian boudoir minded sexuality. They have a history of being austere, plain, prosaic Nightwear up until the final decades of the Nineteenth Century whereupon they became increasingly adorned in lavish lace & ruffles at the high collar, placket, bodice & sleeve cuffs. Whilst still fully cloaking the feminine wearer, they appear to have discretely migrated in their role of being passion killers in the mid C19th to passion arousers by the end of the century. The discarding of the Night Bonnet might also be seen as another step along the road of feminine sexual liberation, however the erotic affect of the eyelet lace frillings fully framing the wearer’s face should not be discounted & it is significant that the Nightcap undertook a stunning revival during the ensuring Edwardian & Flapper eras as the open lace net & crocheted Boudoir Cap. The History of Underclothes, authored by Phyllis Cunnington goes into some depth of analysis into the psychological profile of the Nightgown as it became more decorative throughout the latter half of the Nineteen Century & it is significant that the garment’s long established romantic appeal endures to this day with it fetching considerable prices as it regular appears on eBay as indeed does all manner of Victorian whitework related underclothes. Responses to my missive are most welcome.


Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s